Join the debate ...

To comment on a home page post, click on the "# comments" link at the end of each post. To comment on any other page just scroll to the bottom of the screen and type in the comments box.

Sunday, 24 July 2011

Thinking about human rights.

Smoking is a serious health hazard … so how can I stand up and talk about human rights with regard to smoking?  

And what about the rights of non-smokers to clean air? 

This issue makes people uncomfortable, and it makes some people quite angry.

Do people really have a right to smoke? Well, no, not specifically. But look at this context - people diagnosed with mental illness do have legislated rights to:
  • make their own choices
  • have access to the best possible mental health care
  • be treated in the least restrictive manner possible
  • to not be discriminated against on the basis of our mental health
  • to not be treated in a cruel or inhumane manner, and to be treated with dignity and respect

For example, the right to make our own choices is protected under the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities, specifically paragraph (n) “Recognizing the importance for persons with disabilities of their individual autonomy and independence, including the freedom to make their own choices”.

Let’s also remember that I am talking about people who have been deprived of liberty and held against their will in psychiatric wards – with no crime having been committed. We are talking about people who are experiencing the most extreme levels of distress imaginable. And we are talking about an organisation (the hospital) whose aim is supposed to be alleviating that distress.

So while we may not have a specific, legislated right to smoke, in this context we do have the right not to be forced to stop smoking or to have our suffering and restrictions increased.

These are just some of the ways that our rights are being violated by enforced smoking bans:
  • Enforced smoking bans deprive people of their right to choice.
  • Enforced smoking bans increase suffering and distress.
  • Enforced smoking bans are yet another example of unnecessary and inappropriate restriction of mental health patients.
  • Enforced smoking bans are only happening to people with mental health issues – why are we being singled out?
  • Enforced smoking bans in the context of a psychiatric breakdown are cruel and inhumane.
  • Smoking bans are being enforced in a manner deprives us of dignity and respect, including physical searches for cigarettes and punishment for transgressions.

It’s easy to talk about human rights when it’s politically correct and obvious, but what happens in situations like this when the water gets muddy? There are many other scenarios which are not so clear. For example, whose rights are more important here?

The vision-impaired person with a guide dog who works as a cook, or the diner who wants their food prepared in a ‘hygienic’ environment?

The right of a nation such as China to prevent its population reaching unmanageable levels, or the rights of a couple to reproduce?

Sometimes human rights do conflict with each other. Smoking bans could be seen as one more example of that. But there is nothing to be gained by one party trying to shout down the other by claiming that their rights take precedence. Because, of course, all of our rights matter.

The ideal solution is to find a way in which all parties may have their rights addressed. Often this is not possible. However in this instance, such a solution is easily possible by the installation of smoking shelters in psych ward courtyards. Small smoking shelters are cheap, easily available, and protect non-smokers from the impact of smoke.

The installation of small smoking shelters in psychiatric ward courtyards would allow everyone’s rights to be respected.

If you have any thoughts about human rights in this context, please add your comments.


  1. Hi Indigo,

    The solution is Air Filtration combined with Indoor Air Quality Standards.

  2. Good luck with your campaign. I write about the smoking issue here

    In answer to your question, I believe a non-smoker's right to "clean air" if such a thing exists anyway, ends where our right to free association starts. Those who hate smoke and smokers would not be affected if we had choice, ventilation and even segregation. There are lots of solutions satisfactory to both sides of this debate which is no longer about health but the eradication of tobacco and its consumers by any means.

    Have you read books such as Velvet Glove, Iron Fist by Christopher Snowdon and Smoke Screens by Richard White? Both have excellent research and VGIF carries every study on SHS. Almost all show there is no effect on health. Some show a PROTECTIVE effect and others show an irritant effect. None show lung cancer for SHS.

    Danger of second hand smoke, and now the invented third hand smoke, is simply propaganda to achieve the ideological aim of a smoke free world - decided back in the 1970s before any study on SHS was done.

    The anti-smoker industry picks on the vulnerable like the mentally ill because they are easy to bully.

  3. HI,
    Nice post. really very much interesting.. I think your blog is great information source.. Thanks!!

  4. nice information provided. thanks for that. keep posting of blogs in the future. thanks once again..
    Cheap Kamagra

  5. These suggestions tips are wonderful. That i enjoy brainstorming about catchy subject lines

  6. I did my research before i tried this highly controversial product. I am by no means a lightweight. I’ve been getting my mellow on for a good 10+ years.

  7. This comment has been removed by the author.

  8. The new electronic cigarette is already a very popular item. Because of this, many different types have been created. This can be great because it offers many different options for all different types of people.
    Electronic cigarettes
    e-cigarette talk
    reviews of electric cigarettes

  9. Every day I visit a number of blog sites to see content, however this offers quality based content.
    510 ohm reader

  10. Ecigs have given people who smoke a bit more freedom and safety.

  11. You are absolutely right when you say that no one has the right to force a smoker to quit. Today smokers are really discriminated, and I think the better way is to create designated areas for them! People have their reasons to smoke, and in some cases a cigarette is better savior from stress.

  12. If somebody wants expert take on the main topic of blogging next I advise him/her to go to this site, continue the fussy freakshow rda

  13. I am very much pleased with the contents you have mentioned. I wanted to thank you for this great article. dab rigs

  14. It is imperative that we read blog post very carefully. I am already done it and find that this post is really amazing.
    Buy Vaporizers Canada